Q re-posted it, along with the enlarged hands holding the cigarette. That photos was vetted, discussed and gone over with a fine tooth comb years ago on FR.
To me it’s obvious there are more than 5 fingers holding the cigarette on the knee.
If it was a bogus photo Q would not have re-posted it, especially the enlarged segment.
Q did not repost the pics.
Q referenced/replied to an Anon post containing those pics to send us searching for the real identity of Obama’s couch mate.
Whether they are holding hands or not, the handholding blowup is a distracting misdirection because it distracts from directing the focus to who the person in the photo is.
This is why I said Q choosing that particular Anon post to reply to, when others were available with the pic he wanted and without the extra distraction, seems sloppy to me.
It’s because doing so was likely to produce prickly side discussions like this one. That handholding issue was discussed to death back in the day, and It has never brought any light. Worse, I suspect the whole handholding thing has always been a distraction from discovering who that person really is.
Remember when we were told long ago that Obama was a carefully groomed plant who would destroy the US, and that the destruction would be completed when who and what he really was would be revealed after the fact?
I am prepared for Q to be anyone from a Barron Trump team to a Vladimir Putin team, and I find the Q questions useful, regardless.
I’m paying attention to things like this, just in case Q should start leading us consistently to division, if for no other reason than “Future proves Past”.