Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: thoughtomator
Actually, not to tax was set up as the federal government's way of staying out of religion. It is the hands off approach. I think it wise a wise choice.

Even though the government does not tax a church, it still is able to make other demands, like fire safety regulations.

A church is expected to be a good neighbor.

For the government to tax a church means they also have the right to tell the church what to do.

The Bill of Rights prevents any whiff of interfering with the spiritual work of a church.

If they can interfere with a church's mission then they can also take away our guns.

In Australia they are working to force a priest to expose what is said to him in a confessional. That is wrong and stepping way in where the government does not belong.

39 posted on 06/15/2018 9:35:12 PM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Slyfox

> For the government to tax a church means they also have the right to tell the church what to do.

By that logic, then since they can tax citizens they have the right to tell citizens what to do. But the lawful Constitutional order is precisely the other way around.

Of course, if the types of taxes which would apply to organizations simply didn’t exist, there wouldn’t be a problem - churches could be tax free, as would every other organization, and the government wouldn’t be the decider as to whose religion was a real one and whose wasn’t.


46 posted on 06/15/2018 9:51:57 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson