Replies

Translation: We are throwing Comey under the bus so that this doesn’t go any higher. We don’t want you to start looking at who might have told him what to do.

Absolutely. My reading is they are cutting it off at Comey (already fired), McCabe (already fired), Strzok/Page (already dirty), and maybe a few more naughty texting, gift taking FBI agents.

RR is trying to contain this within the FBI. He is protecting the DOJ and of COURSE the big wheels like Hills, Obama, and the Obama administration people.

This will fail once the unredacted/unmodified report comes out along with the other reports. When RR is gone, we will get a MAGA person in his spot and then we will see what we will see.

Keep the faith, FReeQs. This is just the opening act. We expected a white washed report and we know the media will do what they do. This is no time to go wibbly.

Trust the Plan.

Bagster

There is a very interesting train of thought apparently first surfaced by the now infamous SerialBrain (SerialBrain2) on Reddit that "Q" later linked to re Corsi et. al. - I've not yet read, but as I understand brief description of it, basically ... something like ...

If the F-I/D-J were to say there was political bias influencing their decisions then it would taint any case they might bring against senior leadership - as Lisa Page told IG, this is America, they're entitled to their political beliefs! Instead they go after them for "insubordination" and other things that one can line up against dept. policy & procedure manuals + guidelines, etc.. This is exactly the same rationale outlined in the Comey firing letter that [[RR]] prepared for POTUS.

I found this theory interesting because we just saw it employed last week with the prosecution of James Wolfe - note, in that recently unsealed indictment, Wolfe was not charged with any disclosure of classified info, something his attorney was even noting - rather they nailed him on the process stuff i.e. lying to the investigators.

These cases are difficult to be sure - but if you remove politics from it, and base the case on things particular to their course of duty, then it's possible you could even get a DC jury to convict.

That said, all of the stuff that focuses on conclusions etc. in (#3) IG report we've been given read like [[RR]] speaks.

NOW note that "Q" has gone from "#[[[RR]]]#" to "[[[RR]]]" to "[[RR]]" after first "[RR]" - there is something to deduce + infer from such ...

MAGA! ;)

Copying from another site with a long Q thread:

Anonymous 06/14/18 (Thu) 22:26:25 bd1990 No.1753841>>1753847 >>1753849 >>1753856 >>1753875 >>1753911 >>1753926 >>1753932

NUNES JUST SAID THEY CAN USE WHISTLEBLOWERS NOW BECAUSE OF THE IG REPORT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!