It's an incremental game.
Big breaks are rare. Remember Comey admitting he leaked, to Collins of all people? That's the scale of "maximum revelation" in a hearing.
Another point is that the evidence of malfeasance, conspiracy, whatever you want to call it, that evidence is going to be almost entirely circumstantial, not direct. It's the nature of the crime that direct evidence just isn't created in the first place.
I think lots of good stuff is going to come out of the hearing on Tuesday, and this is an opening shot. From a distance. Forces haven't really made contact yet - not in a way the public can see.
Ok point taken.
I really like direct, provable, damning evidence tho, like passing SAP data around on unsecured servers and other things that will result in immediate and harsh punishment.
I will work on adjusting my attitude about the hearings.