If I thought the Republicans would lose the Senate, then I would be concerned about impeachment; however, were the democrats to take the house and impeach president Trump without having the votes in the Senate to convict, then we get to watch that party commit suicide.
Everyday more and more people are seeing president Trump is doing a good job and are, sometimes begrudgingly, saying you know he's alright. I've never seen a politicians turn negatives around like our VSG. I remember a popular president getting impeached it didn't go as planned.
Q says it is set in stone and will happen
Nobody knows the future anyone who claims to is lying - this is probably an effective way of spotting a confidence man/woman - people claiming to know the future - its fun to predict I don't deny that but part of the problem I have with Q is there have been predictions made and from my perspective the bar keeps getting moved.
For me I like clues. This is a special thread just for that.
Fair enough go for it but thats just it, this is a game somebody is playing and I believe those buying in are the pawns. These horoscopic type Q drops make some rather specific predictions like today and further tell us things that our experience contradicts (trust sessions trust some other jackass) - and presented, obfuscated in some sort of EE cummings like attempt at a haiku. If it is that important spell it out for us - this shouldn't be some sort of Agatha Christie version of Tetris.
Why you would want to disrupt this fight to restore our Constitutional Republic? Which is really what this whole narrative is about, as we are all supposed to be on the same page.
Heavens no if thats what its about to you then go for it - I don't see it that way. I see Q making claims and predictions about events and them not coming to pass and providing excuses for those who are obviously responsible.
Also whats with all the obfuscation if its all about what you say it is - I guess I like the Paul Revere approach better.
There has been plenty to prove that Q is the real deal for me, but if you have proof to the contrary, go right ahead but your opinion that you “think” he’s a hoax won’t resonate with those who understand what has been researched and processed through all this.
Can I proof that an anonymous entity doesn't exist no I can't. I can recognize the same gambits flim flam artists use and I see them here: Lots of predictions, vague references, referring to people and organizations in acronyms. Moving the bar - so close next time its a lock sort of thing.
CGato it doesn't surprise me at all that upon closer inspection of government you find all sorts of shenanigans but I submit to you that's a common occurrence and most of time we don't have the time, inclination or inspiration to look. Part of the Trump phenomena is people waking up to how badly we the American people are getting shlonged and are starting to look!