If you could come to these threads and prove Q is a hoax then I’m all for that but to come in here with just opinion that you “think” he’s a hoax, that’s another thing entirely.
If you haven’t followed any of this, then you have no clue of what has been revealed and discovered through this whole process. Why you would want to disrupt this fight to restore our Constitutional Republic? Which is really what this whole narrative is about, as we are all supposed to be on the same page.
There has been plenty to prove that Q is the real deal for me, but if you have proof to the contrary, go right ahead but your opinion that you “think” he’s a hoax won’t resonate with those who understand what has been researched and processed through all this.
Freegards!
CGato
Hear hear. i was going to add that critique as well. I know for a fact there is disagreement among people who are chronic Q posters, I put in plenty myself.
The line of threads is pretty open to disagreement on detail, and even on some principle.
Heck, this morning (maybe yesterday) I opined it would impossible to tell the difference between a very good larp and a real insider, neither having perfect crystal balls. That's tantamount to opining that Q could be a larp, and I'm not pilloried for the thought.
Meanwhile, there have been many many lines of fruitful substantive inquiry, not along the lines the MSM would have us pursue, but fruitful just the same. A good use of time on the whole, IMO.