* The raw, actual, original IG report
* The redacted version of above.
* The Rosenstein version of the IG report, with redactions - probably the one given to Congress
* A summary report, sealed, written by Rosenstein, not for public consumption.
I venture to say that Wray's BS press conference statement was written by his "boss", Rosenstein, possibly delivered by Wray under duress.
It appears the IG report is silent on addressing the possible favorable editing of 302s including the 302 for Hilldogs interview.
It appears that the IG report is silent on addressing, as part of Emailgate, that Hilldogs attorneys were also witnesses, yet present during her meeting with the FBI/Stroke-Struck, etc. This interview was not recorded, not under oath, and the 302 was likely very light-weight.
The IG report appears to be silent on addressing the FBI's engineering (which could have only been politically-driven) the voluntarily destruction of evidence on the behalf of Hillary and her attorneys who were also witnesses. (FBI destroyed laptops and possibly other devices or records).
This in not only a witch hunt, but they failed to identify a real witch. Rosenstein is conflicted in all dimensions and directions.
How could RR pressure Wray? I know RR is his upline (puke on that thought) but from what I gather, Wray is a good guy, Q says to trust him. So how could RR force him to say crap or whatever it was he said? (I didn’t hear Wray’s comments.)