Thanks. Interesting page 14 tidbit of news, it I don’t see that in the “earth shattering” release promised for 6/11.
. I still don’t see anything on the headlines that warrants huge news (firings, arrests, cold hard evidence of Obama/Hillary/Deep State guilt told to the public).
Anyone? What was the “ big” news that happened or was promised?
I still don’t see anything on the headlines that warrants huge news (firings, arrests, cold hard evidence of Obama/Hillary/Deep State guilt told to the public).
Anyone? What was the “ big” news that happened or was promised?
Nope, nothing earth shattering today, so far.
The big news event of the week will be the OIG report, we don't know how big that will be, but we know about it because it's been announced by the OIG, it's not something that has to do with Q drops.
Bagster asked me if I "trust the plan", and my response was that I don't really understand the plan, although some parts of it: mass arrests, military tribunals, Gitmo housing the arrested, etc. seem to be part of it, and I am skeptical that anything like that will ever take place.
It was right at the end of the last Q thread, so maybe he didn't see my response, but I think someone summarizing what the plan is (in bullet points or a few paragraphs of simple English) would be helpful.
Here's our exchange:
ME: So, why did they take six ADDITIONAL months to make this case public?ME: I'm still skeptical that there is a plan, which I guess is the entire theory of Q, when you get right down to it.
BAGSTER: Because it's part of "The plan."Q said "Trust the plan" and "Trust Sessions" more than once.
Sessions/Q/Trump didn't make the Wolfe indictment public because they needed time. Time to roll up more bad guys, time to not alert bad guys they were coming, and time to prepare other cases.
What do you think of that, Jack? Do you trust the plan?
I'm not one of the people saying it's all totally fake, though. I posted, a couple of hundred posts back, only a few of the comments from NeonRevolt's latest long post. The rest of the post was full of absolutely sickening pictures of Asian Argento and Anthony Bourdain, covered in blood, in a slaughterhouse, with weird occult symbols all over them.
Q has popped the top on a lot of this. Pizzagate had come and gone, in a most unsatisfying way. And now it's back.
The NIXVM bust was really interesting, I'm waiting to see what comes out of that, too.
But as far as the plan, well it's like most things Q: there are a lot of interpretations, some of them conflicting.
If that plan includes, a mass roundup of prominent people, using military tribunals to try them, moving them to Gitmo for the process, using military units to make the arrests (is this ringing a bell?) ... then I remain very skeptical.
Are those legitimate Q themes, or did a false Q-interpreter add those to the real Q stuff.
So, in summary: I still don't feel that I know the plan enough to trust it.
I am looking forward to the OIG report. I would be happy to see some indictments stemming from it. Hell, I'd be happy to see McCabe indicted for the previous OIG report, which at least got him fired.
That's about the extent of my trust at this point.
But, of course, I'm always hoping to be pleasantly surprised. The fellow "paralegalAnon" has made some predictions about future indictments and/or suicides. I'm watching those.
A couple Q predictions that from less-than-guru level understanding of Q seem to have failed are the MOAB which was promised for a month ago, and the #ReleaseTheVideo claim from a few months back.
I believe Q also said back in November that Hillary was going to be arrested on the following weekend, and no, I don't believe that happened, despite the foot casts and such.
If "the plan" is only available via interpretation of the (now surely in the hundreds) of cryptic Q postings perhaps you would be so kind as explaining it in simple English, or even bullet points for the many of us who are reading and participating in this thread and still don't have a good feel for it.
Do you remember EST? At times Q reminds me of EST? Was it real, or a come-on? Or both? I never went to EST, but I had friends that did. They tried to explain it, and I remained skeptical.
There is a trend there. It's nothing personal against you or Q. The insider explanation of Q is that is for the select: the "autists" and such. Maybe I just don't fit in to that group.