Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All
Horowitz Clearing the Deck:

Office of the Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice

Public Summary of a Management Advisory Memorandum for the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Regarding Inadequate Actions Taken to Mitigate a National Security Threat

In March 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) began an audit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) efforts to address homegrown violent extremists (HVE). In August 2017, during our audit, we became aware of a national security threat posed by activities of an HVE who is incarcerated at a federal facility outside DOJ’s authority. Upon receiving this information, we alerted FBI Counterterrorism Division (CTD) executive management of our concern and continued performing audit work to obtain further information about the significance of the threat and to assess the FBI’s handling of it. In response to our notification, FBI executive management took formal steps to coordinate with parallel leadership of the non-DOJ federal entity to mitigate this threat. This document provides an unclassified, publically releasable summary of the OIG’s recommendations to the FBI to further mitigate the threat to national security identified by the OIG during this audit. The FBI concurred with the OIG’s five recommendations, while noting some disagreements with the OIG’s analysis.

Based upon our interviews and review of available documents, in 2013 the FBI first became aware of activities of an HVE incarcerated in a federal facility outside DOJ’s authority that posed a threat to national security. At that time, FBI personnel coordinated with the responsible federal entity regarding methods to address the threat. This coordination continued intermittently over a 4-year period. However, we found that these efforts did not adequately mitigate the threat. As noted, the FBI’s recent actions taken following our notification to and involving CTD executive management, appear to have resulted in constructive steps to mitigate the threat. The OIG recommends that the FBI coordinate with the other federal entity to establish formalized procedures for this situation and to ensure that the threat posed by the HVE inmate is appropriately mitigated.

The threat posed by the activities of the particular HVE housed at a federal facility outside DOJ’s authority indicates that there is an increased risk that similar circumstances may exist with respect to other individuals, including HVE subjects, in the custody of other non-DOJ entities. Therefore, the OIG recommends that the FBI evaluate and determine appropriate actions, in coordination with appropriate other entities, to mitigate the potential national security threats that could arise from HVEs held in facilities outside the DOJ’s authority.

We provided the FBI, our congressional oversight committees, and the non-DOJ entity with more detailed information about the circumstances discovered during our audit in a classified memorandum so that it can assess and take immediate corrective actions regarding the national security concerns we identified. The OIG will continue our audit of the FBI’s efforts to address HVEs and we will incorporate in our final report any actions taken by the FBI to address the issues raised in this summary and in greater detail in our classified memorandum to the FBI.


1,517 posted on 06/12/2018 6:55:46 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1514 | View Replies ]


To: Steven W.

What’s outside the jurisdiction of the DoJ? Outside the country? In the Military Justice system?


1,520 posted on 06/12/2018 7:03:04 PM PDT by mairdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1517 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.

So the detail are classified and essentially, the whole thing is ‘redacted’. Good grief.


1,521 posted on 06/12/2018 7:03:12 PM PDT by LuvFreeRepublic ( #MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1517 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.

“HVE who is incarcerated at a federal facility outside DOJ’s authority”


Would not all prisoners be under DOJ if in fed facility/prison? Except maybe those under military supervision, like maybe GITMO?


1,715 posted on 06/13/2018 2:40:03 AM PDT by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1517 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson