When I have read q-anon posts, they seemed incomprehensible. The posts on this thread continue this trend. Does any q-anon stuff make sense? Is the lexicon actually a code manual?
Tru dat !
Yes. The lexiQon is a supreme effort by one highly motivated, patriotic, and hard working FReeper (Swordmaker) in collaboration with us all. It's a great start to understanding Q. I highly recommend it to you if you are truly interested in trying to understand the Q program.
Good luck.
Bagster
Many of the early ones were, for sure. Later ones seem to be terse summary predictions. The predictions seem, to me, to be plausible given what we know.
Some of the past "statements" were "out there" as far as content goes, but to give one example, i doubt I would have learned of "Operation paperclip" but for following the Q threads.
-- The posts on this thread continue this [q-anon posts, they seemed incomprehensible] trend. --
That's true on pretty much all public forums.
They still are...
Does any q-anon stuff make sense?
NO.......
But if you say it does then they'll let you into the club, like a Mensa......
You just read and absorb and after a while the terms and the various interpretations of the terms start to become clearer. That’s the fun part, getting pointed to things you would have never heard of had you not been following the drops. I guess I’ve been at this for months now. It’s very compelling!