Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers
I have addressed the two comments you made previously, although the misspelling I missed until someone else pointed it out again today.

As far of the list of fired people, it is now linked from the Notes in my metric.

Have a nice day, FRiend.

285 posted on 06/09/2018 6:52:44 PM PDT by Jack Black (Redemption of our fallen Republic requires blood atonement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Black
Jack, reading you has inspired me to comment on the general state of things and wax philosophical. I have provided a soundtrack below so hit that link as you read.

Into the Mystic

You are a very smart guy and have excellent gung fu, including pictures. I admire your writing skill. I do love hanging around really smart people like the type that can be found on FR in general and this thread in particular.

There, now that I've kissed your ass sufficiently, let me give you my opinion. When you first showed up on these threads, I got the impression that you, like many others, felt it was your mission to disabuse us of our "Q Quackery".

I have developed a theory that some of the smartest conservatives, yourself included, seem to take it personally that people would defer to a nebulous internet figure rather than to your expertise. I use LS as an example. They, and you, feel challenged by a possible insider that people listen to. There are other FReepers besides LS who I think have this syndrome.

Anyway, that's just my opinion. On to you. You have stated that you think there is a cabal or group of us FReeQs that have some type of gang mentality and want to force people off the thread in a group effort. That's not the first time somebody has presented that theory. (Hoosiermama and her coup, for example.)

As the so called leader of the "B clique (hat tip; Hoosiermama) and a so called "boss" of the thread (hat tip; NIKK and Fatima) I have to tell you that you couldn't be anymore off base or paranoid. I will say that, after months of defending against so called "troll" attacks, mockery, and ridicule, some people have become defensive of their support of the Q program and can be provoked very easily.

Surely, if you're fair-minded, you can understand this. Like I said before, if you want to see ugly, try posting a positive Q message on any other FR thread. To accuse participants of this thread of that type of behavior in comparison to that is ridiculous on it's face.

Anyway. Here's the thing, and I speak only for myself. I don't have a problem with ANYBODY that contributes information to this thread and the overall Q program. We are all trying to understand what's going on here in America and indeed the World in the age of Trump. It's an actual war that's being fought.

I, for one, welcome you and any other smart (or even not so smart) people who decide to participate in that war on the side of the good guys. I consider support for Q to be equivalent to support for Donald Trump and in fact America. But I would, because I believe that Q is a Presidentially authorized psyops program.

So, Jack. To put a bow on it. Discussion is great. If your intention is to add to the information pool with research and analysis, then I say good on ya. If your intention is to debunk Q, then I will oppose you.

And another thing. You made a statement earlier that "we" are trying to tell people what to do and think and that you weren't. I disagree. We all are trying to convince others of something. Your chart is trying to make a point, neh?

How's that? Reasonable?

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

306 posted on 06/09/2018 7:35:17 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson