So basically you shared this no name confession and don’t understand it yourself? Yet, anyone who reads Q is the mindless follower? Do I have that right?
btw, it wouldn’t require a PhD in Q terminology to ‘understand’ what that person wrote, so I’m wondering how it is you, being a legal brain, would find it challenging to understanding what was written. Hey, maybe, just maybe, it’s a way to add more confusion! So, if I write a confession and add all kinds of goobly gook and legal minds can’t unravel my confession, then it means ‘I’ am confessing to being ‘Q’ and ‘I’ am a fraud with a conscience.
Sheesh
I guess you missed my caveat when I posted this letter stating that I am not vouching for anything regarding the letter or its contents. Whether it is believable or not is not for me to say.
As for my lack of comprehension of the Q letter, since it includes numerous references to people, things and acronyms that only a Q follower would know, what it referred to I have no idea what it means.