I understand that the purpose is to bypass the media. Makes sense. What I dont understand is why it has to be written in code to avoid detection when apparently the code can be easily broken by amateurs. THAT makes no sense. It either is secret or it isnt. There is no half way.
I think your all or nothing logic is flawed.
Fairly open-ended structured Socratic type questions direct responses in several useful ways that get around human tendencies to argue with plainly stated facts.
Further, when they do refer to classified stuff, they do so in a safe, legal way. Folks can INFER many things but that's not a great problem, legally, imho, because the Socratic questions do NOT DISCLOSE anything classified. They merely hint in useful directions for pondering.
However, you are certainly free to throw rocks at Q and the whole phenomenon if that's what tickles your fancy. I just think you are wrong.
What I dont understand is why it has to be written in code to avoid detection when apparently the code can be easily broken by amateurs. THAT makes no sense. It either is secret or it isnt. There is no half way."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As you are aware, I have a TS+ background. Posting an oblique, generic hint to something UNCLASSIFIED that may relate -- indirectly -- to a classified subject -- to stimulate enlightening research in that area ---does not violate security protocol.
Example: labeling an image file, "187_site_E" has zero bearing on what classified action may/not be (or might/not have been) taken at that site.
But, for those insightful enough to decode the filename and investigate the site, it arms those investigators with valuable, shareable, UNCLASSIFIED evidence and insights into the depths of child trafficing, paedophelia, child sexual abuse and torture, ritual child sacrifice and "pedovore" cannibalism that seem to be endemic to the Deep State cabal.
~~~~~~~~~~
Is such [UNCLASSIFIED] information gathering & sharing effective?
Take a look at yesterday's and today's news in Arizona...
Clear enough?
TXnMA