Yes I think you’re correct to suggest water is a very dynamic factor which the experts with an agenda tend to overlook in their climate models. It’s as if they’re deer in the headlights of CO2, and can see nothing else. There are many other factors as well which I doubt they pay enough attention to. To make predictions without real experimental data is to go backward almost 400 years, before Galileo invented the scientific method.
There is a recent TED talk about clouds being a climate “scientist’s” enemy. It was done by a pretend scientist, bemoaning how clouds muck their results.
A real scientist would welcome the realization of a phenomenon that mucks their result so they would have a better understanding of they way things work.
What climate “science” is now...is trying to get a few trillion dollars in transfer payments. That is a lot of opportunity for corruption.
DK