Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

Hmm.... feeble intellect struggling to keep up...how did they figure they could take Trump out before election without any type of legal prosecution? Just accusations? Seems to me they would need paperwork with some patina of legality in order to take him out either before or after election. Just making up smack and announcing it via their handmaiden MSM/DSM would not be enough even before election, IMHO.

What are National Security Letters? (If I ever knew, I forgot now


400 posted on 05/25/2018 1:38:15 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

‘how did they figure they could take Trump out before election without any type of legal prosecution?’

Remember at one of Trump’s campaign rallies he said he hoped Russia would find Hillarys lost emails.

I think HRC, BHO and deep state decided to give DJT’s campaign those emails ie. plants within campaign and then FBI could swoop in and make it public that they had received illegal info.


411 posted on 05/25/2018 2:16:02 PM PDT by slag (reelect nobody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah
-- ... how did they figure they could take Trump out before election without any type of legal prosecution? --

Bad press. Billy Bush, etc. and anything they could get.

-- Seems to me they would need paperwork with some patina of legality in order to take him out either before or after election. --

They don't need any "paperwork with a patina of legality" if he loses. The need for paperwork corresponds with asserting a finding that the government saw "collusion with Russia." The narrative that the Russians hacked the DNC on Trump's behalf is supposedly supported with non-government "Crowdstrike" material.

The value of having "government papers" comes into play only if he is elected, and then it is used to dodge criminal charges and to advance to impeachment and removal.

-- Just making up smack and announcing it via their handmaiden MSM/DSM would not be enough even before election, IMHO. --

It usually is enough. Most candidates would have folded early. One mistake they made was thinking Trump would be a weak opponent, a joke of a candidate. Otherwise he would have been attacked harder during the primary.

-- What are National Security Letters? --

National security letter - Wikipedia
National Security Letters | Electronic Frontier Foundation
National Security Letters: FAQ | Electronic Frontier Foundation <- quick read
National Security Letter Statutes <- dense/legalese

Very contentious surveillance tool. No warrant, no suspicion needed.

417 posted on 05/25/2018 2:34:05 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson