Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
Question: I couldn't read the ruling on Trump's twitter blocking, but it sounds by comments that the court ruled he can'b block anybyd. Now I know he has an official Presidential White House twitter account and a personal RealDonaldTrump account. Does the ruling cover both the professional and the personal? Or does it even make it clear?

So let's say Trump blocks some troll on his personal account> Can the troll, based on this ruling, now sue because his Civil Rights have been violated? Haha. Outrageous.

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

867 posted on 05/23/2018 11:27:27 AM PDT by bagster ("I love ideas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 847 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

http://www.lulu.com/shop/robert-beauchamp/stonewall/paperback/product-23417011.html

This report details/documents a major act of corruption committed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

To wit: In early 2013, then FBI Director Mueller withheld the following information from the U.S. Senate, which was in the process of confirming Senator John Kerry to succeed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. That, in 1998, Middlesex County (MA) ADAs Thomas O’Reilly and David Cunis conspired to frame Robert Beauchamp for murder to retaliate against him for threatening to publicly expose Kerry’s homosexual relationships with former DA John Droney and Gardner Museum robber George Reissfelder. DOJ DAG Rod Rosenstein and FBI SAC Hank Shaw have been withholding the above-summarized Mueller corruption information from President Donald Trump since late May 2017!

Me: Reference to this found on page 4 of Doc 59 in the Cohen search warrant case, 1:18-mj-03161-KMW


880 posted on 05/23/2018 11:41:37 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 867 | View Replies ]

To: bagster

The “can’t block trolls on Twitter” order and opinion is based on a rationale that Trump is a public official. The ruling doesn;t apply to people who are not public officials, period.

Good question if it applies to ALL public officials. Generally, remedies in court apply only to the parties, and Trump is the only one sued. In this case, those persons are Trump and Scavino. The venue affected is @realDonaldTrump. The order goes no further than that.

The Court is inviting more lawsuits.


883 posted on 05/23/2018 11:49:28 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 867 | View Replies ]

To: bagster

The court found that the @realdonaldtrump account is not personal, Trump conducts presidential business on it, and if he blocks someone, he’s violating the First Amendment. So it will not apply to our personal accounts.

This case is the stupidest, “reaching”, most frivolous waste of time!! The babies are whining because they can read what the President wrote. They can read EVERY COMMENT ON HIS TWEET EXCEPT HIS...and they had to go whine to a judge about it. Balderdash!


907 posted on 05/23/2018 12:37:34 PM PDT by blu (The "B clique"...spreading humor since 1888. Not bossy enough for the A clique.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 867 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson