You can see Fuddy in the upper left, with both her upper and lower life jacket chambers inflated. That means both cartridges were expended. The NTSB's report narrative was to give the coroner (since she was already slated to die) a reason to be stressed and brought to a stage of hyperventilation. The story would be that an infant life jacket couldn't sustain her, especially when it was only half inflated. That storyline "blows up", however, when she's captured in the video shortly after exiting the plane wearing a fully-inflated adult life jacket. Note that is looks very different from the known-to-be-infant life jacket of the guy in the middle of the top picture.
This would be just one of several clearly incorrect statements from the NTSB.
(BTW, it appears my photo provider isn't happy with the bandwidth my pix are using. If the picture doesn't immediately appear, it will hopefully later, or I may have to use a different provider. YMMV.)
The story would be that an infant life jacket couldn’t sustain her, especially when it was only half inflated. That storyline “blows up”, however, when she’s captured in the video shortly after exiting the plane wearing a fully-inflated adult life jacket.
...
I just watched another video showing Fuddy holding on to the wing and no life vest is visible. How do I know your image and identifications are correct?