Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RedMonqey

This whole Royal wedding thing may be the event people look to as to when marriage as an institution jumped the shark.

A feminist statement at a wedding?

“I don’t need you, but I’m going to lower myself into this arrangement with you because I’m going to benefit materially from it.”

Is that the statement? If it is, got it. Loud and clear.


176 posted on 05/19/2018 10:28:45 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: RinaseaofDs

I won’t pretend to know the British nor young Prince Harry. I do wish this young couple all the best because they are going to need it.

My “no deal’ comment was too short and too curt but does sum up my feelings of foreboding for this marriage.

If true, three marriages is an indication of either she is “high maintenance” or extremely unlucky in love. His side is no font of wisdom or marital bless either. And add in her leftist views and I can see why others give this marriage five years tops.

The British tabloids are notorious in building the Royals up only to tear them down.
Hoped she packed a good pair of iron panties. She’s gonna need them.


178 posted on 05/19/2018 11:48:57 AM PDT by RedMonqey (" Those who turn their arms in for plowshares will be doing the plowing for those who didnÂ’t.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson