Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meghan Markle will begin bridal procession alone, in bold feminist statement (new SJW Princess?)
CNN ^ | May 18 2018 | Max Foster

Posted on 05/18/2018 1:12:00 PM PDT by ethom

Meghan Markle will make a striking feminist statement in her wedding to Prince Harry on Saturday, choosing not to be chaperoned for much of the procession down the aisle of St. George's Chapel, Windsor, CNN has learned.

In an unprecedented step for a royal bride in the UK, Markle will walk unescorted down the aisle of the chapel nave, after being met at the West Door by a member of the clergy. She will be accompanied in this first part of the wedding procession only by her bridesmaids and page boys, with the senior church figure walking ahead.

Prince Charles will join her when she reaches the Quire, where the main royal guests will be seated. The Prince -- Harry's father -- will walk Markle down the Quire aisle to the foot of the altar.

But Charles will not give her away to her husband-to-be in the traditional sense; instead, he will stand back as Markle approaches Prince Harry.

CNN understands that Markle came up with the plan herself. It was always the intention that her father Thomas would meet her at the Quire and she would walk the first part alone. Ill health has since prevented him from coming. Both Charles and Harry are delighted with the plan, CNN understands.

No other royal bride in the UK has walked unescorted down the aisle at their wedding ceremony. Markle's decision indicates that she wishes to assert herself as a strong, independent woman who is prepared to challenge royal norms.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Local News; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: 1776; royals; whocares
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-179 next last
To: caww

Can’t wait to see their firstborn. You know she’ll be pregnant as soon as possible.


81 posted on 05/18/2018 2:37:50 PM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ethom

I hope the wedding night is as wild as you imagined Harry, as you are making the biggest mistake of your life !

A sweet ass ain’t worth a ring


82 posted on 05/18/2018 2:38:04 PM PDT by WashingtonFire (President Trump - it's like having your dad as President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethom

Yawn


83 posted on 05/18/2018 2:44:03 PM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

“...She fails to understand the significance of a wedding....but then it’s her second aisle run.”

There will be no real marriage This is just another “role” for her to play.


84 posted on 05/18/2018 2:50:36 PM PDT by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on behalf of animals would do so on behalf of the unborn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: kalee
George VII may be the ring bearer to an American princess, straight out of Braveheart or the Patriot ...we really have won the revolution after all!


85 posted on 05/18/2018 2:50:40 PM PDT by ethom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ethom

I predict trouble in paradise inside 12 months.


86 posted on 05/18/2018 2:53:06 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethom

Nope, Prince Charles will walk her down.


87 posted on 05/18/2018 3:33:43 PM PDT by citizen (President Trump: HeÂ’s combined The Art of the Deal with AlinskyÂ’s Rules For Radicals. Game over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethom

Why should I believe CNN’s spin on the royal wedding any more than I believe their spin in their all Nevertrump all the time Stateside coverage?


88 posted on 05/18/2018 4:18:24 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethom

Harry: I’d rather not be royalty.
Meghan: I want to be a princess.

Harry: The role is governed by tradition.
Meghan: Screw tradition.

Nope, no cognitive dissonance going on here.
What’s the line on this marriage at Ladbrokes?


89 posted on 05/18/2018 4:20:08 PM PDT by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

80% of the human population has brown eyes.

Blue eyes are recessive so for a child to have them, both parents must have blue eyes.

My mom had blue eyes my dad had green eyes so I came out brown!


90 posted on 05/18/2018 4:45:55 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart For)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

Edward VII Wanted to marry an American commoner - a divorcee in the 1930s. British public opinion was shocked as that went against the mores of the era so he was finally forced to abdicate.

That wouldn’t happen today.


91 posted on 05/18/2018 4:48:58 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart For)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

Wow!


92 posted on 05/18/2018 5:00:59 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Have an A-1 day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ethom

“telling that Meghan has no matron of honor....”


What do you mean?

I didn’t have a matron of honor.

.

.


93 posted on 05/18/2018 5:08:23 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ethom

The strong independent woman needs to sign a contract that prevents her from ever spending a cent of her husband’s money.


94 posted on 05/18/2018 5:09:31 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Did you not read my post ? I just told you that both of my brown-eyed parents had the “Bb” gene and produced me, a blue-eyed child with a “bb” gene. Only one parent with a solid “BB” gene cannot produce a blue eyed child, even if one parent has blue eyes. They can if one or both carry the recessive “Bb” gene. In your case, you had a 50% chance of having either brown or blue eyes. You inherited a “Bb” gene as a result.


95 posted on 05/18/2018 5:10:57 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Architect of Avalon

They didn’t sign a pre-nup did they?


96 posted on 05/18/2018 5:11:50 PM PDT by pnz1 (#IMNOTWITHHER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Ed

Cressida is beautiful.


97 posted on 05/18/2018 5:11:57 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

“Blue eyes are recessive so for a child to have them, both parents must have blue eyes.”

Uh,uh! I have brown eyes,husband green,and we had one blue eyed child-—the exact color of my blue eyed mother.

.

.


98 posted on 05/18/2018 5:14:44 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: EEGator; Bryanw92

Imagine paying for used shoes that a lot of guys had already worn.


99 posted on 05/18/2018 5:15:07 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ethom

I watched a lot of Deal or No Deal and don’t remember her. I always liked Anya.


100 posted on 05/18/2018 5:15:29 PM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson