I can't speak for edzo, but I bet I can give a close guess, because I think he probably feels like I do about smoky's posts.
Threatened, you say? Not in the least. Beyond skeptical doesn't even approach it. What I see is somebody claiming to have special powers of perception and then claiming to have cracked certain "codes" which reveal things to him and only him. He then lays it out for our consumption in cryptic "Q-like" posts which we are supposed to decipher as if he himself had some reason, like Q actually does, to be cryptic.
Do like the rest of us do. Speak our theories in plain English text. Justify them if you can, and don't try to tell ME it's because some lyrics on a radio station are part of the Q program in some kinda way and are sending messages. There is no need for Q to work that way. None.
There is no hidden message system contained on the HistoryChannel.com. Again, there is no need to send top secret messages to us using that system.
One can take anything and make it fit into anything else if you try hard enough.
I'm not sure what smoky's game is, if in fact it is a game. Or maybe he truly believes that a King Tut mask on the history channel holds the secret to the Deep State's demise.
And this is the reason I'm opposed to Smoky's method. MANY people read this thread. How do you think we are being perceived when we get on board with such obvious wackadoo about song lyrics that have absolutely nothing to do with Q?
It's hard enough trying to explain Q without having to defend that kind of insanity. And, if I'm being completely honest, feelings be damned, it IS insanity.
I, personally, have a lot of time and emotion invested in working the Q program for the good of America and our people. I hate to see it divided and demeaned with so potentially harmful mental meanderings. Maybe talk amongst like minded people via mail? Take it to the Trump Train thread, which I hear is a less serious venue? You can talk about birds and King Tut till the cows come home over there, eh? I hear all opinions are equally valid on "The Train."
So, yea. That's why, cribb.
One man's opinion. It's okay to have an opinion, right Threadmama? Nobody bully me please.
Bagster
Lesser Oracle
Do like the rest of us do. Speak our theories in plain English text. Justify them if you can, and don't try to tell ME it's because some lyrics on a radio station are part of the Q program in some kinda way and are sending messages. There is no need for Q to work that way. None.
I've been trying to formulate a response to this squabble. The S/N ratio is making the thread nearly unintelligible. Your post addresses my main issue so here's a
+1
Thanks.