Replies

I am not against “our current administration and President”. That’s wildly incorrect. I was supporting Trump when half of FR was on the Cruz train.

The claim you got “the top 5 ISIS leaders” if you didn’t get the top guy is really a basic insight, based on simple logic. It’s not based on MSM sources. The link I put in my post (notice, I do that all the time. Protip: try using links to things in your posts so they have some factual content and not just spew) is from Wikipedia, for people who may not know who the leader of ISIS is. (You seem like you probably fit in that category, Ace.)

My simple point is not based on any “fake news correspondents”. I’ve actually spent a lot of time learning about ISIS, including the supreme importance of the leader and his role of Caliph to their world view and jihadi ideology.

I notice you don’t back up your personal attack on me (again, unnecessarily invective filled) with any quotes, either. Sad.

But you accuse me of lying. LYING? For saying that the Top 5 isn’t the Top 5 just because some reporter said so.

It’s more name calling, and no facts.

Go to hell, Orc.

DUGUDICHI-

H.J.Ansari Zarif’s senior advisor: “If Europeans stop trading with Iran and don’t put pressure on US then we will reveal which western politicians and how much money they had received during nuclear negotiations to make #IranDeal happen.” That would be interesting.

I'd like to hope this isn't just a rumor. I guess we'll see.

I’m an innocent bystander with a couple of questions.

What relevance does being #2-6 or #3-7 have? Does it matter at all it they are not exactly 1-5?

Say it does matter, 1-5 or nothing. Can there not be different divisions or groups within ISIS, each having their own 1-5? Perhaps 1-5 in the country captured?

I find the focus on this distinction irrelevant.