thanks the link wasn’t working earlier, but I had seen the image of the article No_doll had posted,
that article mentioned the CEO of Rosatom visiting Iran
Rosatom of course is connected to uranium one and Hillary, makes we wonder if the visit was really already planned or if the deep state is afraid to talk by phone or email etc.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/hillary-clinton-uranium-one-deal-russia-explainer-244895
What is the Uranium One deal?
The deal in question involves the sale of a Canadian company, Uranium One, with mining interests in the U.S. to Rosatom, Russias nuclear energy agency. The sale occurred in stages, beginning in 2009 when Rosatom purchased a minority stake in Uranium One, and continued in 2010, when the Russian agency took ownership of a 51 percent share of the company. In 2013, a third transaction gave Rosatom full ownership of Uranium One.
With its purchase of Uranium One, Rosatom assumed control of roughly 20 percent of uranium production capacity in the U.S. The current licenses issued to Rosatoms U.S. subsidiaries, issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, prohibit the company from exporting uranium outside the country
What are the allegations of wrongdoing?
Controversy surrounding the deal largely pertains to 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state in 2010 when the State Department signed off on Rosatoms purchase of Uranium One. Several of Uranium Ones owners were also donors to the Clinton Foundation, giving $145 million to the charitable foundation, and critics have alleged that Clinton greenlighted the sale to appease donors to her familys charity.
Connections between Clinton Foundation donors and Uranium One were first published in 2015 by The New York Times, which based its reporting in part on the book Clinton Cash, by Breitbart News senior editor-at-large Peter Schweizer.
The allegations resurfaced last October, when The Hill reported that the FBI was investigating Kremlin bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putins atomic energy business inside the United States.
Is there any truth to the allegations?
As PolitiFact has laid out in great detail, there is no direct evidence of a quid pro quo among Clinton, the State Department, Rosatom and the Clinton Foundation donors with ties to Uranium One. Clinton has repeatedly denied any involvement in the State Departments approval of the Uranium One sale, insisting that such approval was granted at lower levels of the department and would not have crossed the secretarys desk.
Jose Fernandez, who was the assistant secretary of state for economic, energy and business affairs when the Uranium One deal was approved, told the Times that Clinton never intervened with me on any [Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States] matter.”
Beyond the State Department, eight other government agencies approved the Uranium One sale.
(excerpt)