That's nothing I quoted in any of my posts, yet with your quote marks and context, that's evidently your claim. --FAIL!
Your logically-flaccid point is apparently if someone uses a British spelling, that that person is automatically a "British troll[]" that should be disregarded out-of-hand. I previously thought more highly of the Brown Deer reputation; that's just silliness!
Furthermore, I don't know that it's reasonable from someone who doesn't know me from Adam to suggest that I make myself beholden to anonymous friends that I "pick up" here. I certainly trust links Q has endorsed much more quickly than I would put any trust or ascribe any persuasiveness to Brown Deer's quick ejaculation of "Nonsense!" in response to lengthy, evidence-laden argumentation, or a link from you to an overly-long-winded, hat-in-hand YT from JRLC or a ping to the person you brought to your first post to me over in a year. That was anything but a résumé enhancer.
There is no "Jake" that deserves comparable consideration to Q, as Hicks has averred without contradiction from Corsi. There have been no private Q comms to invite Hicks or Corsi to give his somehow-endorsed analyses (#1343--or is it your continued position that Corsi is right and Q remains compromised?).
With all your critique and behaviour --oops!--, it seems Q considers people like you are definitely rooting for the wrong team and that that team should be "disregarded immediately", as it's really "time to move on."