Q !4pRcUA0lBE 78 📁 NEW
May 11 2018 00:11:07 (EST)
Facebook is listening to you 24/7/365.
Literally.
[F9 algorithm]
Are they recording/safe-housing?
Metadata collection?
Building 8.
DARPA.
[CHINA-CHINA-CHINA]
Q
Q !4pRcUA0lBE 77 📁 NEW
May 10 2018 23:45:37 (EST)
[Example]
Clinton Foundation.
Post Election Loss.
Layoffs.
No Access / Control = No Donations
Today.
NZ Donation Restart.
Others?
Why?
1) Selling Secrets?
2) Selling 'Future' Access [regain control/power]?
3) Selling Silence?
Read below slow and carefully.
FVEY.
Why do 'Former' Dignitaries Still Hold SEC Clearance?
U.S. to U.S. = Logged/Flagged/Recorded
U.S. [in] NZ = No Logs/No Flags/No Records = U.S. Sec
Clearance AUTH FVEY VIEW + Doc Take.
Read above slow and carefully.
WHY DO WE ALLOW [FORMER] DIGNITARIES SEC CLEARANCE?
Welcome to the Deep State.
Future to prove past.
Q
Anonymous 05/11/18 (Fri) 09:44:12 e51948 No.1370733Spy agencies silent over funding (24 Feb 2014)
The New Zealand Government's spy agencies have refused to tell MPs whether they receive funding from other members of the Five Eyes intelligence network.
The Government Communications Security Bureau and the Security Intelligence Service have been replying to questions from Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee on Monday.
The GCSB and the SIS were asked whether they get funding directly or indirectly from the governments of Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom or the United States.
Both withheld the information. They also refused to say whether any foreign government paid for any positions within the agencies.
However, they did confirm that they do not collect wholesale metadata on New Zealanders and, to the best of their knowledge, American counterpart the National Security Agency does not either.
Labour Party leader David Cunliffe says if it does not compromise the agencies' operations, then New Zealanders are entitled to know about any such funding.
"But I can't give a categorical view on that because I do not know the background. And that is the catch-22 with spy agencies. At the end of the day, it comes down to the integrity of the Prime Minister and the good judgement of the Prime Minister as the guardian of the public interest."
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/237108/spy-agencies-silent-over-funding
Clearly, the white hats know what HRC, Hussein, et.al., are doing, but what are they doing to stop it? Are they setting traps? Are they moving data around so she/they can’t find it? Inserting false data?
They kept security clearances for these people for a reason, so I would expect that they’re dealing with these events as they arise.
If she’s selling information for money for the laundering scheme known as the Clinton Foundation, then perhaps they’ve set her up to fail miserably and obviously. Imagine she has sold obviously provable bogus data to NZ for $$$$. New Zealand is an unhappy customer and announces that to the world. Future sales of secret data dry up, thus deeply cutting funding to the deep state.
Just speculating here. If she’s wearing a bulletproof vest, then she knows that she’s a potential target to somebody. Perhaps her SS detail has kind of abandoned her, or left her open often. How would YOU like to have to guard the likes of HRC or Hussein?