ThanQ!!
I also remember ?three? quarterly renewal requests -- some (all?) signed by RR...
It's beginning to like like that, at most, RR facilitated continuation of skulduggery that started back in 2016 with 0b0z0.
~~~~~~~~
More and more, I think I perceive the plan for a grand entrapment -- with the exposure to come -- not from Trump or Sessions -- but, from Judges. (Just look at how much leftscum was pulled in as participants when Mule put together his cadre of libtard lawyers...)
Now, what remains to be seen, I guess, is RR's [unredacted] charge to Mule...
ThanQ again!
TXnMA
--
I also remember ?three? quarterly renewal requests -- some (all?) signed by RR... --
The list I prepared has the original October 2016 request and three quarterly renewals. Out of those four instances, RR signed the last one, and only the last one.
-- I think I perceive the plan for a grand entrapment -- with the exposure to come -- not from Trump or Sessions -- but, from Judges. --
Or from Congress. I think the judicial stepping in was a windfall surprise, not designed.
-- Now, what remains to be seen, I guess, is RR's [unredacted] charge to Mule... --
That is by far not the only thing!
Funny thought. All the "Sessions is not aggressive enough" criticism, ID's Holder as a strong AG. So when Sessions ignores being held in contempt, and ignores subpoenas, he's behaving as Holder, a strong AG.
DOJ has responded to Nunes announcement that DOJ ignored his "classified letter." DOJ says it responded to it, didn't ignore it. Needs careful parsing - Nunes may have said SESSIONS (not DOJ) ignored it, so DOJ saying that it replied is not-responsive to the charge from Nunes. On Maria Bartiromo around 10:32 this morning.
with the exposure to come...from Judges Good point, it does appear to be more effective to have a judge say, "Where's the beef?" to them like with Mueller.