Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jeffersondem
I’m not following your ownership claims but I understand President Lincoln and his backers were miffed. You don’t kill 600,000 people unless you are miffed.

I'm not sure how you could not follow the ownership claim. Fort Sumter was built by the federal government on landed deeded to them free and clear by the South Carolina legislature. So to use your analogy, the homeowner was in the home at the time. The former owner despoiled the place by bombarding it. So sure the current owner was miffed. Who wouldn't be?

1,109 posted on 06/11/2018 3:42:18 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1108 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg; BroJoeK; OIFVeteran; HandyDandy; Bull Snipe; DiogenesLamp
“I'm not sure how you could not follow the ownership claim. Fort Sumter was built by the federal government on landed deeded to them free and clear by the South Carolina legislature.”

At the time of the Ft. Sumter incident the fort wasn't even in the United States.

Secession changes things. That is why the British no longer have garrisons at their previous Fort Augusta, Fort Barrancas, Fort George, Fort Mackinac, Forte Bute, Fort Prince George, Fort William and Mary, and so forth and so on.

1,111 posted on 06/11/2018 5:58:22 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson