Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

You can probably build an orbiting but continuous “ring,” starting with a few points along the ring and then building towards each other, ultimately connecting. And maybe the ring could be fairly wide -— but all the bits need to be essentially in orbit. (See Niven’s “Ringworld”)

With a Dyson sphere, the “polar parts” are NOT in orbit.

As the belt gets wider and wider, it reaches a point where the orbital velocity of the edges is no longer counterbalancing the tendency to “fall” inward to the star.

At the extreme — the poles — orbital velocity is zero, and the rest of the sphere would have to somehow “hold it all up.”

Unless the ETs have some form of antigravity...


8 posted on 05/04/2018 5:59:22 AM PDT by William of Barsoom (In Omnia, Paratus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: William of Barsoom

“(See Niven’s “Ringworld”)”

IIRC, Niven later wrote about how the Ringworld would be unworkably unstable.


15 posted on 05/04/2018 6:11:10 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The Red Queen wasn't kidding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: William of Barsoom

Building a sphere around a star?

That would take more than an entire planet’s worth of material.


60 posted on 05/04/2018 8:13:27 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: William of Barsoom

A Dyson sphere would require the resources of several solar system at least, given the star to planet size ratio.


77 posted on 05/04/2018 12:05:11 PM PDT by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson