Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

Seriously? You trust mueller and sessions?


9 posted on 05/03/2018 8:22:33 PM PDT by JoSixChip (He is Batman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: JoSixChip
Not Mueller. Sessions, yes.

Q never said to trust Mueller. Also, it's not wise to believe EVERYTHING anybody says.

Not even the almighty Q. Just almost everything. Don't think one dimensionally. Expand your mind.

Bagster

10 posted on 05/03/2018 8:24:27 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: JoSixChip

Of course the Qers trust Sessions AND Mueller. Without Sessions’ recusal there would be no Mueller. It’s stupidity to suggest that it’s possible to trust Sessions without trusting Mueller. If Mueller were not to be trusted, why hasn’t Sessions fired Rosenstein by now? Sessions is so pure where recusals are concerned—well, Rosenstein is hopelessly conflicted re the FISA warrant. If you trust Sessions then you have to trust Mueller because Sessions is backing Rosenstein all the way.


13 posted on 05/03/2018 8:30:11 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson