[eyedigress]

I’m going with 4.

I hope you are doing OK after all the Q attacks this week.

Some of us are watching. They really wanted you down. :^)

[Enchante]

Sorry to hear about the Q-mobs, I had been away from FR for more than a week until today. I might have to start some anti-Q threads to gather the sane, rational people together.... except that I don't think I really care that much about Q-cult stuff.

[Fantasywriter]

I’m inclined to go with 4 also. Interspersed with some of the less impressive items are a few details that seem definitely Deep State-oriented.

Thank you for the kind words. I’m fine. I don’t take the Qers very seriously, plus they are entirely predictable. It’s all good.

[Enchante]

What seems to me to weigh against 4 is that Q seems so damned amateurish. Of course, a psyops campaign might be designed intentionally so as to appear so amateurish (misdirection so that no one would think of professional Deep Staters), but could “they” really count on gullible fools to swallow it?? And if they wanted it to be a highly successful psyops campaign to help the Deep Staters, wouldn’t they want it to be as convincing as possible?

Just some musings.... It still strikes me that “Q” is an individual motivated to try to launch an idiosyncratic “movement” in support of POTUS Trump and against the “Deep State” .... but Q is quirky, somewhat unhinged (just who from Washington, DC is getting shipped to Gitmo this week?), not too knowledgeable beyond what he happens to read this week on the web, etc.