I have looked at LOTS of alleged “evidence” and many many times found it wanting.
No, I do not have to live full time amidst Q-world (or Scientology, numerology, astrology, spirit cooking, etc.) to make a reasonable, provisional judgment about whether something is worth pursuing a lot further.
EVERY group, EVERY view ever propounded can say “you have to devote months/years to our studies before you can have any opinion at all about whether this could be worthwhile.” “you have to look at ALL our claimed evidence before you can have any judgment at all.” etc.
I am viewing a ***certain amount*** of what has often been put forward as important Q-evidence and/or understandings. Then I am simply asking whether I think it is worth pursuing a lot further. I am not trying to have opinions about particle physics or something that is already recognized as deserving many years of close study in order to form any good judgments.
The Q stuff is not meeting my minimal threshold for “deserves a great deal more investigation.” I’m sorry that I have higher standards than you guys, ha haaa. Sorry.
Words....wind....blah blah blah.
Enchante is debunked. I have a list of options about the Enchante program.
a.) Enchante is a lart. A fat pimply kid with a thesaurus in his mom's basement having a goof.
b.) A deep state psyop devised to protect the Deep State and thwart MAGA and President Trump.
c.) A.I. (Heavy on the Artificial and light on the Intelligence.)
Choose.