Posted on 05/03/2018 12:21:39 PM PDT by ethom
.
>> “Harry would’ve been better off visiting a college to snatch himself a pretty and intelligent young lady of around 18 or 19.” <<
Precisely my philosophy!
.
Plus, you have at least a 10% chance she MIGHT be a virgin at 18.
=rolling eyes=
Markle has been on weird diets for many years, is bulimic skinny, and her age doesn't help either, re getting preggers/having an healthy baby.
She now has dumb Harry on a strict, stupid, NO MEAT diet as well, so what his sperm count is/shall be, is up for grabs.And he led a rather wild, unrestrained life style until recently, to boot.
Harry probably isn't all that much of a "catch", but surely, there must be some young Brit aristo girl, whom he could have and absolutely should have wooed and won, out there.
Prince Harry is an idiot. He’ll suffer for it.
Yes he is and yes, he most probably shall rue the day he married her; if not met her.
I think those flotation devices are fake. The number one rule is if a woman has implants, run away as fast as you can, unless they are due to reconstructive surgery.
I know very little about this whole, sordid, affair but with all those issues there should be huge air raid sirens going off, not just red flags.
“she uses people and then discards them faster than old underwear, when their usefulness for her expires.”
Perhaps Harry’s usefulness won’t expire?
Your assertion that marrying without a prenuptial is foolhardy is debatable. The famed American divorce attorney Marvin Mitchelson has said that he has never seen a marriage begun with a prenuptial NOT end in divorce. If you pledge yourself to someone “for better or worse”, yet already have divided up the spoils e”just in case it all falls apart”...you are not really getting married. This is ESPECIALLY the case when the people getting married have no children and hope to have children together. Harry and Megan have a better shot of remaining together for the long haul because they ignored all the cynics and lawyers.
The highest Markle will EVER be is a DUCHESS; never a PRINCESS, and NEVER a QUEEN, unless she can figure out how to Harry's father, brother, sister-in-law, and their kiddos killed in one fell swoop.
OTOH...Kate WILL one day be Queen and Markle, should she last that long, which I doubt, will have to curtsy to her.
Markle doesn't approve of guns, dosen't shoot, doesn't hunt, and won't allow Harry to do those things, or even go to those parties.
She doesn't ride, for all I know, and I know a LOT about her, nor does she do any of the usual Royal/aristo/landed gentry passtimes.
So lets say that she picks the "friends" they have, which aren't of the proper sort ( she's already glommed onto "POSH" Beckham ), and tries to tell Kate what she should do & eat and raise the kids ( she loves telling others what to do ! ), which isn't her place, and then the stifling grind of public duty sets in.
Being a ROYAL isn't some stupid Disney movie!
What if she wants to do something she isn't allowed to do...then WHAT?
This is the highest level she'll ever reach there. Will it be enough? I doubt it!
“American divorce attorney Marvin Mitchelson has said that he has never seen a marriage begun with a prenuptial NOT end in divorce.”
I get it! A prenup is like planning for failure, right? Well, do you have car insurance? If so, you must be planning to have an accident. I have never seen a car accident that did not begin with SOMEONE getting car insurance. Correlation does not equal Causation.
Poor stupid Harry is already henpecked and whipped!
How long before that begins to pale?
The concept is the same, a prenup is a form of insurance. So, I made the argument that just because you get one does not mean that you are planning for failure. No more than getting any other kind of insurance does. It does not matter that you USE your car, the analogy stands. You may not like it, but that does not make it untrue.
One may not be “planning†for failure if one gets a prenup, but, as your reaction indicates, Harry’s NOT getting a prenup indicates he is resolutely refusing to acknowledge his marriage may fail. If there is a COST to such an attitude — and you are arguing there IS such a cost — then there MUST be a benefit. The benefit is that refusing to get a prenup is making a bet that the marriage will be permanent. Such optimism skews the odds. So...if it’s about odds...how will it turn out? As I posted earlier, we do not know> Send me private messages every year...we’ll see...
Yep...
Can’t wait to hear some recordings along the line of “Royals Rap”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.