Posted on 05/03/2018 12:21:39 PM PDT by ethom
Meghan Markle's estranged half-brother has penned an extraordinary letter warning Prince Harry to call off the Royal wedding.
Thomas Markle Jr, who shares the same father as the royal bride-to-be, says he has not seen his sister since 2011.
'This is the biggest mistake in royal wedding history,' Thomas Markle Jr wrote
The 51-year-old, who shared his letter with In Touch magazine, wrote to Harry: "As more time passes to your royal wedding, it became very clear that this is the biggest mistake in royal wedding history.
(Excerpt) Read more at standard.co.uk ...
Maybe this is Liz’s wedding present to Harry.
Even her childhood friend outted her for wanting nothing but to be a real princess since they were little. Wake up, Harry.
I give it 6 years. Long enough to pop out a couple of kids to establish her claim. That is if she’s not too old.
Yes, once The Prince of Wales became KING, Wallis knew where that was heading and did try to get out. OTOH...she DID save the UK from having a Hitler loving, Nazi symp for kind.
Take the worst parts of Simpson, throw in Sarah F's crazy side, and then, for good measure, add a HUGE dollop of wee barry O. and the NOOOOOCH and you have Markle!
Yes, she IS a phony; also a manipulator, low class, and wants to be THE STAR of the show. She's been wanting to be a princess since she was a child, was consumed with DI and has tried to emulate her...which she is failing at; except for the crazy part.
I give it 2 years, but maybe you're right and it'll take 3. It all depends on IF she can get and does get preggers.
I feel sorry for Harry. The only love she’s found is for gold and name.
Even her childhood friend says she’s set her cap to becoming a real life princess since they were young.
Hear Chuckles was off with Horseface the day of the wedding or the day before causing Diana to question getting married right down to the last minute.
Markle is a "BOLTER"; she uses people and then discards them faster than old underwear, when their usefulness for her expires.
All of Harry's old chums got married, leaving him to be the third wheel at all events and he no longer had anyone left to behave badly with.
His old, much more suitable girlfriends either got married or wanted NOTHING to do with him.
Yes, he said that he wanted someone who could handle the "pressure" so picked Markle; however, she is NOT handling it well and shan't.
For someone who, since childhood, has been obsessed with the Brit Royals, Lady Di, and dreamed of being a "PRINCESS" ( which she'll NEVER be ( she'll only ever be a DUCHESS ); let alone Queen ! ), you'd think that she would have learned taken the time to learn about all things Brit, but she hasn't.
She's been on weird diets for years, is extremely skinny ( not just thin ), is 36, and getting preggers may not be easy for her.And the wanted attention, may just be too stifling for the likes of her; this is real life, not some acting gig.
If he doesn't demand a strict watertight prenuptial, then neither is she.
It sometimes comes down to the big head vs the little head in the male. It’s been going on since Adam and Eve.
Interesting factoid: Anne Boleyn was executed on May 19 as engineered by Henry VIII. His descendant, Prince Henry of Wales (Harry) is marrying Megan on May 19. They should start calling themselves Henry and Ann (since the last syllable of her name is “an”) just to mess with everybody.
He's under Markle's thumb and I bet she's the one who threw a fit about it.
Princess Bimbo.
Yes, that really IS an interesting factoid and not exactly the best of augurs for a WEDDING DAY.
But then, neither one of them is very bright.
Prince William chose wisely. Kate Middleton is gorgeous, well-educated, and comes from a happy, nice family. Kate is a class act.
The massive dysfunctionality Meghan has with her family is a HUGE red flag. She’s three years older than Harry and is divorced, more red flags. She’s also a cheap B rate “actress,” a creature of Hollywood and all the sleaze that goes with it. Another BIG red flag.
Harry is an idiot.
Think how much things have changed since Charles and Diana became engaged: there was endless chatter that Diana had to have some royal blood AND she had to be a virgin. LMAO
Given her ideology and that those of the SJW persuasion don’t think “wymmyn” have made their bones until they’ve racked up multiple abortions, one wonders how many SHE has had.
Supposedly Wallis Simpson got knocked up by someone in Mussolini’s inner circle, had an abortion and it rendered her sterile. As a result, had Edward VIII remained on the throne, his niece Elizabeth II still would’ve been the next monarch (albeit in 1972 rather than 1953), although that assumed Edward not being deposed for his political views.
Having grown up a spoiled brat, given everything she EVER wanted and treated as a pet by her much older 1/2 siblings, to boot,and her father taking her to the set of MARRIED WITH CHILDREN, all the time, at a young age, who knows what she's done or not done in the past.
Bat$hit crazy?
Well then she’s marrying into the right family.
Think of Charles, HIS father(well, at least til the DNA tests come in)
Think of Diana, his mother.(Got herself killed by a drunk driver her Bo hired)
The whole British Commonwealth is full of “eccentric” lords and ladies.
There’s more than reason Our nation broke away from Britain.
The only difference between her family and his is MONEY and outdated system of Royalty!(At least the kings of old had to sally forth onto the battle field and defend their “Divine Right of Kings”)
From her Wikipedia entry:
“in Beijing Wallis met Count Galeazzo Ciano, later Mussolini’s son-in-law and Foreign Minister, had an affair with him, and became pregnant, leading to a botched abortion that left her infertile.”
OTOH...several of the books DO talk about the sex stuff she learned from residences of bordellos in China.
Even if it is a dubious claim, the likelihood that her infertility was due to either an abortion (or abortions) and/or that she was probably riddled with STDs from her numerous “encounters” isn’t far fetched.
The old standard of royal males marrying virgins was obviously borne of the knowledge that doing so with “fallen women” (as Markle certainly is) jeopardizes the likelihood of issue. Even if Markle was a virgin, that if she was impregnated on her wedding night, she’d be a risky 37 to deliver the first child. From that standpoint alone, Harry would’ve been better off visiting a college to snatch himself a pretty and intelligent young lady of around 18 or 19.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.