Posted on 04/30/2018 7:01:38 PM PDT by ransomnote
OR
K-nock. K-nock
Whose There?
:)
All those links. Can you give a summary, no? I scroll better than I can click and chase.
Bagster, this is cool.
It’s the most environmemtally-friendly package ever imagined then delivered. Kinda like directed lightning, which, as you know, fertilizes. Instantly.
I must admit the NSA didn’t register with me at first (confirmation bias effect?). It does seem to be consensus that NSA is white hat but I’m sure even they have their DS lurkers.
>>Excuse me...<<
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Rita, I think I was trying to agree with you—if your point was that Petraeus sees a different reality now, in the Trump era.
Fantastic piece: Its hard to imagine anything worse for a democracy than journalists coordinating with political operatives and spies who are paid by the press to leak information about American citizens. But thats where we are. We have hit rock-bottom. https://t.co/qoG1v49Nf5— Tracybeanz (@tracybeanz) May 2, 2018
Actually, we hit rock bottom some time ago. We’ve since crashed through that bottom and found a whole new bottom.
http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/261158/trump-russia-collusion
So, according to Simpson, the Trump Tower meeting proved the part of the Steele dossier that claimed the Trump team was taking the Kremlins dirt is truemeaning that Simpson is virtually admitting that the meeting between Trump Jr. and Veselnitskaya, his business partner, was a set up. The dossier memo that claims the Trump team wanted dirt on Clinton is dated June 20, a week and a half after the June 9 meetingat which that dirt was offered, and which was arranged to help establish the collusion thesis. In Simpsons Aug. 22, 2017 testimony, the phrase disclosures this year refers to a New York Times article published a little more than a month previously, July 8, reporting that the presidents eldest son met the previous year with a Russian lawyer, who, according to the Times, has connections to the Kremlin. Who, you might ask, gave that story to the Times?
Even the Times original story on the Veselnitskaya meeting emphasized her links to the Kremlin. Thats the point of the set-up, to underscore her relationship with Russian officials in order to substantiate the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Yet now, that information, which the paper itself reported, has been retroactively imagined away. The purpose of the recent Times storyasserting no one really knew before now of her deep Kremlin linksis to cover the papers own role in the operation, while perpetuating the Trump-Russia narrative.
While it is difficult even for partisans to retail the literal version of the collusion thesis with a straight face, some version of that narrative, however qualified, or figurative, has to be trueor else the Times, like the Post, CNN, NBC, and countless other media organizations have printed thousands of stories and editorials whose underlying premise is simply false, sending the reputations of dozens of reporters and opinionators up in smoke, Pulitzer Prizes and all.
Its hard to imagine anything worse for a democracy than journalists coordinating with political operatives and spies who are paid by the press to leak information about American citizens. But thats where we are. We have hit rock-bottom.
ARE NBC AND CNN PAYING OFF TOP SPIES WHO LEAKED INFO WITH ON-AIR JOBS?
News of the News: How the Trump-Russia collusion sausage gets made
By Lee Smith
May 1, 2018 9:30 PM
All the way down to
...China.
Start 631
L8
I am still savoring the epic Q drops on Iran, Syria (Iran's hidden nuclear program), EU and U1 ... all conveniently verified by Netanyahu ... if one was paying attention to Q's "map."
And why is there no more mention of the Israeli strikes in Syria on Sunday? When they first hit the Internet it was even suggested Israel had used tactical nukes.
And why have we forgotten about the mysterious collapse of the mountain in NK that immediately preceded the end of their nuclear aspirations? Rods from God? Destroyed the core of the capabilities including 200 top scientists?
And how about the U.S. beginning to repel invaders at the southern border? The start of a West Bank in Mexico? Will the U.S. military have to invade Mexico to stop them from entering and acquiring "rights"?
Thank you, sad but true. Great article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.