Had it become public, the unverified material would undoubtedly have been used by political opponents to cast serious doubt on the attorney generals independence in connection with the Clinton investigation, Comey writes, according to ABC. He calls the material a development still unknown to the American public to this day.
So, it's unverified but it would have 'cast serious doubt' and it's a 'development' still unknown?
Incongruity, much?
Haretz.com has a stream link somewhere, on my phone or I’d hunt it down and post it.