Posted on 04/26/2018 7:46:16 PM PDT by ransomnote
New thread, bromeister.
Q
mark this one???/
Maybe for the same reason the rest of the child traffickers own pizza shops.
The fix was in. Coney was trying to look and stay relevant. Trump and Trump voters changed the game by voting larger than the fix! Game change Boom! Rule change! New Sherriff in town BOOM!
Comey ‘OOPS!’
What about that little troll-plagiarist, Doris Kearns Goodwin?
Later
It is a very funny line but it helps Mel Brooks absolutely skewer political correctness in Dr. FRAHNKENSHTEEN’s response.
That actually makes the most sense.
I’ll take Comey’s word for it; He went out to cover for her:
“I had assumed from media polling that Hillary Clinton was going to win,” Comey writes after discussing the Clinton investigation and his decision-making at length. “I have asked myself many times since if I was influenced by that assumption. I don’t know. Certainly not consciously but I would be a fool to say it couldn’t have had an impact on me.
“It is entirely possible that, because I was making decisions in an environment where Hillary Clinton was sure to be the next president, my concern about making her an illegitimate president by concealing the restarted investigation bore greater weight than it would have if the election appeared closer or if Donald Trump were ahead in the polls. But I don’t know.”
Comey sent a letter to Congress announcing the investigation was reopened on Oct. 28, after the FBI found evidence of previously undiscovered emails on the computer of former Rep. Anthony Weiner in the course of another investigation. Comey has said since, and explains in the book, that because he had announced that the investigation was closed, he felt he had a duty to inform lawmakers that that was no longer the case.
The FBI found no evidence to change its previous decision not to charge Clinton, and Comey announced that the investigation was again complete on Nov. 6, two days before the election.
Comey in his book devotes considerable ink to his thinking during the investigation, and writes: “I have replayed the Clinton email case hundreds of times in my mind. Other than mistakes in the way I presented myself in the July 5 public statements in front of the television cameras, I am convinced that if I could do it all again, I would do the same thing, given my role and what I knew at the time. But I also think reasonable people might have handled it differently.”
Thank you for pinging me to that Hostage
>>Q and some sites commenting on Q might be proposing there’s some identifiable lineage of Moonchildren, which would be a new one for me.<<
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thank you for this explanation.
Could the ongoing lineage be this?
http://www.whale.to/c/george.html
Personally, I still do not see the significance unless it assumed that the moon-child descendants continued with Crowley’s Satanic rituals and practices, or that they were subsumed into a larger Satanic society.
Red Bull is an Austrian high energy drink manufacturer that sponsors the Red Bull F1 Race Team
Bkmk
This is the old thread but....
Last night POTUS Trump talked about vocational schools, and revamping community colleges to teach actual trades. (I will listen again as I couldn’t listen from the beginning.)
This also indicates cutting fed $ for universities/colleges which as we well know, and I’m sure he does too, are hotbeds or rather cess pits of the vilest degradation and perversion, racism, commiepukedom and every variety of evil imaginable and beyond. What to speak of teaching nothing even useful or applicable in the real world (or very little).
Bkmk
George W. Bush, Barbara Bush, and Aleister Crowley
That's what I've seen some sites proposing, but it's an unsubstantiated leap from Pauline Pierce knowing Nellie O'Hara and Frank Harris to the conclusion that Crowley was Barbara Pierce's father, and a further leap to the Moonchild lineage theory--as the author of that link concedes, "I have not been able to determine whether he [Crowley] conducted similar experiments with Nellie, although given the polyamorous proclivities of all the parties involved, one should not discount the possibility." As you say, there would need to be some evidence that the Pierce family continued with Crowley's rituals after 1924, and there's no evidence of that which I'm aware of. The OTO splintered into a few relatively small organizations with no clear leadership after Crowley's death, until it began expanding again with the occult revival in the 1960s. Prior to the 1960s, Crowleyans in the United States were mostly concentrated in Southern California and New York City's gay underground in Greenwich Village, with a few inactive members in Washington DC, plus Hubbard's organization but Hubbard was trying to conceal his Crowleyan background by that time. The Pierce family isn't identified as part of the known OTO network in the United States in any sources I've researched.
Super point. The void must not be filled by Deep Staters again.
Personally, I’d rather slash the CIA and FBI by 2/3 and make sure every last remainder was loyal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.