Normal has two meanings in this area:
Normal can = statistical average or above.
Normal can = average healthy, functioning, effective state of being--REGARDLESS of the statistical frequency in a given population of that healthy, functioning state.
CONFLATING the two definitions is not good science; not good language and not a good argument.
BTW:
The percentage of chaff or deliberately sabotaging contrarian posts on this thread is still far above an acceptable level, to me. i.e., they win--I'm not willing to devote the time to it given their effective sabotaging of the goal and efforts.
It is clear that it is too bothersome to ask the mods to help.
The only effective solution I can think of is to move the archive to my FREEPER homepage. Sigh. Hate to do that but am willing.
WHAT DO Y'ALL THINK?
[WHAT DO Y’ALL THINK?]
Could you post your homepage as an article? If so, that would be an excellent idea. You could edit the content that way.
Normal can = statistical average or above.
Mealy mouthed.
85-90% is far above average. It's almost the full 188%. Or as I like to call it. The norm.
Normal can = average healthy, functioning, effective state of being--REGARDLESS of the statistical frequency in a given population of that healthy, functioning state.
You are now describing a judgement call. When discussing statistics, it is intellectualy dishonest to then jump to subjectivity.
The argument is lost, Jocko. Surrender to the truth.
Also, get back on topic.
:)