Absolutely Trump Jr was Set up, the Russian Lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya had previously worked with Fusion GPS on the Prevezon Holdings case. And of course Fusion GPS was the source of the phony pee pee dossier.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_GPS
In 2013, the US Department of Justice, represented by the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara, sued Prevezon Holding, a Republic of Cyprus corporation registered in New York State as a foreign business corporation, under the Magnitsky Act for money-laundering. The lawsuit sought forfeiture of various assets and real estate holdings in the US.
The sole shareholder of Prevezon was Russian citizen Denis Katsyv, whose father is Petr Katsyv, vice president of Russia’s state-run rail monopoly and “reportedly a business associate of Vladimir Yakunin, a confidant of Vladimir Putin”. Katsyv’s Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya was not licensed to practice in the US, and Katsyv hired the law firm of BakerHostetler to represent Prevezon; BakerHostetler hired Fusion GPS in early 2014 to provide research help for the litigation.
Of course CNN tried to spin in last year.
http://money.cnn.com/2017/07/14/media/trump-russian-lawyer-veselnitskaya-theories-obama/index.html
Was the Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort in June of last year the first evidence of possible Trump campaign collusion with Russia — or was she part of a sinister Democratic plot to entrap the Trump campaign?
Over the past three days, members of the pro-Trump media have settled on their answer, characterizing the lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, as a leftist with ties to the Obama administration. The idea quickly drifted upward to some of the most influential figures in right-wing media, and then ultimately to President Trump himself, who referenced some of its underpinnings during a Thursday press conference in France as he attempted to explain away his son’s meeting with the Russian lawyer.
The theory is based on bits of fact that have been taken out of context or spun in misleading ways to paint a picture that the President and his supporters prefer to the one currently dominating much of the media.
The narrative appears to be untrue, but in some ways that’s beside the point.
What CNN and the rest of the morons can't seem to grasp is that, our side had plenty of dirt on Clinton. Why pay for more?
The American people fell for Bill's charm and were guilted into voting for Obama so they would not be called racists. But Hillary? She has no charm, no charisma, no new plans. She blew whatever political capital she had(if she ever had any) when she tried to lead the socialist health care charge while her husband was President.
Plus she's just not likable! Opinions of this post are mine.