They showed a graph of how the model accurately predicted the weather trends over the last century. Duh. Of course it would because it was based on that data!
They also used very overly positive words to describe the models. They did admit that there are very many variables that have an unknown impact, but then went on ignoring that fact. This means carbon may or may not be causative factor.
A glaring hole was the total lack of a worldwide perspective. Even if carbon is an issue, efforts in one country can be thoroughly inconsequential due to polluters like China and India.
The unstated conclusion of the shows fear-mongering is that there are too many people, and people in other nations ought to stay poor so they dont impact the environment.
You may not know—when they interview TV anchors the number one criteria is how trusted they are by focus groups.