“Why do scientists overwhelmingly agree that our climate is changing, and that human activity is causing it?”
That is all you need to know to not waste one second of your time watching this garbage.
I saw a documentary where the Great Barrier Reef was high and dry. When the ocean level rose, the reef came back to life.
Ancient drawings showing sea creatures and fish and people at a place which is now in the middle of a YUGE desert. It wasn’t always a desert.
Yes the climate has changed. It will continue to change.
MAN has NOTHING to do with it. Humans are inconsequential in the grand scheme of things.
Since the weather report is always wrong. I do not believe any of these computer modeled predictions. It is all a scam.
Did anyone notice that the ‘graph’ they showed repeatedly (with a red zigzag line allegedly showing the increase in co2 from 1960 to the current) DID NOT have a Vertical Axis marked in values or units ?
Submitting a ‘science’ graph like that in a jr high general science class (at least in the old days) would earn you a ‘F’ Grade (and worse in any advanced class).
Without the scale and values the ‘marked’ line could be simply a trivial increase (note how their expert mouthpieces also refered to it as accelerating which even with that line was still largely linear).
-
Another graph going back much longer (the one showing patterns over more than a million years) which they ‘correlated’ CO2 with temperature - did you notice a ‘lag’ effect in a significant part of the pattren where the CO2 increase *FOLLOWED* the temperature increase (there is a REAL climatologist (a scientist not some academic) who has mentioned this effect - that the CO2 appears to go up AFTER the Earth warms up and I spotted that very pattern on the graphed data the show displayed (several times in the repeating patterns they showed).
-
I had to turn it off for a while when they got all Algorish with the ‘showing whats gonna happen stuff’ - DID THEY EVER MENTION Sun activity at all ??? Remember years ago it was mentioned that the planet Mars was heating up at the same time there was the recent warming trend on Earth (and it was pointed out that there is no manmade-CO2 increase there - totally ignored by the chicklittle-warmists.
-
Basically they attempt to demonstrate their theory with very bad unqualified data presentation, counting on a carefully picked short interval of only one bit of the much longer climate patterns, and alot of supposition for their conclusions.
The simplest counter to all of this is the very same people made predictions 20 years ago which have not come true (remember the ‘hockey stick graph ?).
What we must ask loudly is WHY are they going to such efforts to falsify all of this.
I recall that 1000 years ago that parts of the world were quite a bit warmer (minus manmade CO2 emmissions), but these Warmists are loathe to even mention (natural) Iceage cycles which might complicate their narrative.