Replies

I know bagster may disagree with me on this one, because he is so NAUGHTY, but, nevertheless...

Actually, that thread in question is just having a little fun at Q’s expense.

Some can’t participate in the research thread and feel out of place, therefore don’t know of Q’s successes and proofs.

Me? I don’t care. I can “guess” right along with the best of them, but can not contribute a thing to research. But other FReepers aren’t comfortable doing that.

Americans always have fun mocking what they don’t understand. I hate to see us confirm ourselves as snobs and dividing ourselves in cliques, where ‘you’re IN, and you’re OUT”.

I know bagster may disagree with me on this one, because he is so NAUGHTY, but, nevertheless...

Don't you ever worry about disagreeing with the likes of me, Rita from Oklahoma. Or anybody else, for that matter. We do not follow the herd, and that's why we are on FR to begin with. And we are the ultimate not follow the herders, and that is why we have opened our minds to Q.

To be honest, I'm surprised that our independent free thinking hasn't resulted in more arguments than we have already seen. We all understand the mission, is probably why.

...confirm ourselves as snobs and dividing ourselves in cliques, where ‘you’re IN, and you’re OUT”.

I will disagree with you hear, however. We did not choose to set ourselves apart from the sleeping FReepers. They chose to cast us out and ridicule us. THEY have made it "us vs them." We cannot be faulted for responding to that.

For myself, I would love for all FReepers to come together to work on the Q phenomenon. There are plenty of good FReeper brains going to waste. We would be formidable if we were as one (not that we aren't already formidable. Just more so.)

But such is life. We play the hand we are dealt.

FReeQ FRiend, Rita,

"Actually, that thread in question is just having a little fun at Q’s expense."

~~~~~~~~~~~~

You can make all the goody-goody excuses you want, but...

On that thread, (some of) the FReepers were joking around -- but the article was a deadly serious, pure leftist/Deep State Alinsky attack.

Either that or it was one of the worst cases of journalistic ignorance / investigative laziness I've encountered lately. And that's saying a lot!

However, you'll notice that, on that thread, I only addressed the article -- with facts -- and, not the comments or commentors.

You may call it "naughty" if you wish, but, if you have been comprehending what Q is telling us, you'll realize that we are at war with the Deep State -- and they definitely are not laughing...

Nor am I...

TXnMA