Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

Here’s one that is out there. Way, way out there.

I definitely think the tech exists to create aircraft accidents. Q has mentioned 17, and also mentioned that these engine explosions aren’t accidental.

If you wanted to kill someone, and make it look like an accident, you could arrange to have the person sit near the engine and then blow it in midflight. A refinement on the Ron Brown model of downing an entire aircraft to kill one guy.

The row, on most aircraft, is the 17th.

So thin it is transparent. Good for making lingerie.

However, Q did send us down that road.

Will get another crumb soon at it will out.


2,401 posted on 04/20/2018 5:02:11 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2397 | View Replies ]


Dem Congresswoman Rips `Ill-Conceived' DNC Lawsuit Against Trump Campaign - Free Bacon

When Blitzer asked if she thought it was a "big mistake" that DNC chair Tom Perez was filing this lawsuit, Speier said, "I'm not supportive of it, whether it is a mistake or not, we'll soon find out." ...

"Do you think this lawsuit runs the risk of stepping on Robert Mueller's investigation?" Blitzer asked.

Speier doubted that possibility and said, "I don't think that the DNC has been able to do anything more than speculate based on the statements and their complaint."


2,404 posted on 04/20/2018 5:05:17 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2401 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs
The row, on most aircraft, is the 17th.

Is that science?

Yes, thin. But it's something, isn't it? Somethings are good.

But think of this. You'd have to be VERY good to arrange something to make a surgical strike like that without bringing the entire plane down. Most of these things don't strike me as them worrying too much about killing off the whole passenger list to ostensibly get one guy.

2,406 posted on 04/20/2018 5:07:08 PM PDT by bagster (Even pompous jackals love their mama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2401 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

Deep State couldn’t exist without commercial flights - a relatively new phenomenon - so they would know how to take each other out. ‘We’ didn’t need taking out until DJT won.


2,408 posted on 04/20/2018 5:08:21 PM PDT by txhurl (Can I borrow that handsome hard-bound book? Although I will dog-ear every other page to keep my spot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2401 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

My guess is the DS has 20 ways to bring down an aircraft. Kill the target as needed -—the others are just collateral, sheep, useless eaters, sacrifices to Baal if the plane is on fire.

Sometimes seatbelts fail. In row 17 maybe especially...


2,413 posted on 04/20/2018 5:15:54 PM PDT by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2401 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs; All

The probability of that succeeding is very poor in favor of the assasin unless the primary intent is to eliminate the target regardless of collateral damage.

Side note, I think you can conceivably induce a structural flaw in a turbine blade via nuclear displacement fostered by by aiming a particle beam at it for X amount of time. Haven’t yet noodled out the feasibility with respect to source, type, duration etc... (I.e. could you just smear a speck of an emitter on it or would you need something car sized which would fry you while you were parked aiming it).

Also, aircraft technical areas and airports probably have detection equip that might pick it up...

Just thinking on the keyboard...


2,565 posted on 04/21/2018 1:29:35 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2401 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson