Treason is unlikely to be used with a low rung like McCabe. Maybe, Hillary, but yes your words inscribed in your comment are far more suitable for McCabe’s crimes, don’t you agree?
McCabe is a middle management crook who bit off way more than he could chew. I would hope that Rudy would flip him without breaking a sweat and send him away for a few years in return for his testimony against the top crooks.
As vile and morally "treasonous" as whatshername's acts might have been, it's gonna take a slam dunk case to put her where she belongs, IMO, that is UNDER the Supermax or under anything else, for treason. Same goes for anyone else who attained high office, no matter how high, (say a sitting US Senator, or perhaps even higher office, hypothetically) and then used that office to the detriment of the country.
So far as I care anyone who would do something like that can BIH, quite frankly, and sooner rather than later makes me no difference.
Gotta make the case, though in the context of written law, not personal moral outrage. I'm not sure how that would work. I'd love to be proven wrong.
Signing off for tonite... thanks for all your good work on these threads.
Larry Schweikart has mentioned the possibility that McCabe and Brennan were hired by Russia to subvert stuff, basically they may have been paid agents.
That is called spying or treason, of course depending on whatever they were tasked with, if this is accurate.