Posted on 04/18/2018 5:22:54 AM PDT by simpson96
Edited on 04/18/2018 7:04:07 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
ROCK HILL, S.C. (AP)
(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.com ...
Oy!
LOL! Yeh, she spelled it wrong, too!!
Are you kidding me!? You get assaulted by a black biotch, and you’d handle it, eh? He did the right thing. The skank is looking for a payday.
A. A Shacoya.
“Regardless of how old the child is, one certainly does not allow the kid to disturb others in a restaurant.”
I agree but there is a lot to be said for not denying someone the right to eat because there is noise at their table. There is no inherent right to not be disturbed. If someone is crying, people should entertain the idea that it is none of their business.
If someone is crying, people should entertain the idea that it is none of their business.”
It becomes their business because they are forced to listen to it.
The parent should take the child outside——or better still,eat at home or,if traveling,in the hotel room.
.
I’d handle it by ignoring it; not by calling the police.
“It becomes their business because they are forced to listen to it.”
You just struck down the First Amendment.
Nothing a solid punch in the nose wouldn’t cure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.