Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a longtime advocate of the extremist feminist notion that any differentiation whatsoever on account of gender should be unconstitutional. Her radical views are made clear in a book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, which she co- authored in 1977 with another feminist, Brenda Feigen-Fasteau, for which they were paid with federal funds under Contract No. CR3AK010. ...4. The Mann Act must be repealed; women should not be protected from "bad" men.
"The Mann Act . . . prohibits the transportation of women and girls for prostitution, debauchery, or any other immoral purpose. The act poses the invasion of privacy issue in an acute form. The Mann Act also is offensive because of the image of women it perpetuates. . . . It was meant to protect from xthe villainous interstate and international traffic in women and girls,' *those women and girls who, if given a fair chance, would, in all human probability, have been good wives and mothers and useful citizens. . . . The act was meant to protect weak -women from bad men." (pp. 98-99) ...
. . . in the Family
1. The traditional family concept of husband as breadwinner and wife as homemaker must be eliminated.
"Congress and the President should direct their attention to the concept that pervades the Code: that the adult world is (and should be) divided into two classes -- independent men, whose primary responsibility is to win bread for a family, and dependent women, whose primary responsibility is to care for children and household. This concept must be eliminated from the code if it is to reflect the equality principle." (p. 206)
"It is a prime recommendation of this report that all legislation based on the breadwinning, husband-dependent, homemaking-wife pattern be recast using precise functional description in lieu of gross gender classification." (p. 212)
"A scheme built upon the breadwinning husband [and] dependent homemaking wife concept inevitably treats the woman's efforts or aspirations in the economic sector as less important than the man's." (p. 209)
2. The Federal Government must provide comprehensive government child-care.
"The increasingly common two-earner family pattern should impel development of a comprehensive program of government- supported child care." (p. 214)
3. The right to determine the family residence must be taken awav from the husband.
Iirc she tried to back this one down when she saw reaction
THought : Q is rehashing material we all have talked about for months It’s about to happen. Setting stage for action.