[bagster]

Side by side graphics are important.

Which graphics might those be?

[bagster]

Wait. Are we still fighting about Diogenesis pics?

I thought we put that to bed. C'mon guys.

They want us divided.

WWG1WGA? Hello???

[Cboldt]

-- Which graphics might those be? --

I think a general reference, but in this case it could be expressly referential. In context, the graphic and text response in "Q !xowAT4Z3VQ 04/15/18 (Sun) 19:51:07 bbec14 No.1055826" are side by side. Looks like this, the top line is added by me ...:

-- Text in graphic --			-- Side by side --

Public interest [Keep high]		Coincidence?
U1 FBI Informant			SC/LL deal drop.
AWAN/DWS/Paki intel/MB			POTUS Tweet.
Tarmac meeting [SC/LL deal > AS 187]	Tarmac.
Q					Coming soon to a theater near you.
					Q

[Cboldt]

-- Which graphics might those be? --

Ahhh, Q will clarify this expressly.

SS/LL deal drop(s) w/ orig timestamp(s).
POTUS' Tweet.

Coming soon to a theatre near you ...

[Cboldt]

-- Which graphics might those be? --

An anon does the graphics work.

Q of 2/6/18, Q of 4/2/18, and POTUS teet this AM, all referring to "tarmac"

Q expressly approves, "Perfect example of why we are here."