Oh I understand, I've dealt with leftist trolls, who many were probably deep-state trolls, since I first got online in 1996. My original signup for FR was in 1998 but I didn't post much on it back then but it was a great resource for battling these trolls.
I'm highly suspicious on this one, especially those who continue to use the term "Q cult". It sounds way to familiar with "birther" as we now know that was used to try to paint 0's BC researchers in to a corner and end the debate.
You have to wonder why they are so against Q when we are constantly learning new things about what is going on behind the scenes with our corrupt government. As Patriots, we all want to get it cleaned up, That is a very good thing but their motives to distract from that is very suspicious, and especially since they bring no formidable research to the contrary to the table.
CGato
These days there is too much at stake to waste precious time trying to reason with them and they are not even that much fun to play with (there are a few exceptions) :-) Carry on FReeQ!
You have to wonder why they are so against Q ...
_________________
I have gone back & forth on Q.
Last night’s Twitter take down and the continuing restoration of previously shadowbanned accounts cinched the deal for me again.
The Drop stated this would happen. It specified after the testimony. MZ testimony had been a recent discussion.
It happened on time.
Censor filter is still reported to be off (I don’t Twitter).
Someone did something and Q forecast it. It was not an obvious prediction, was it?
Q.E.D.
Flack. Target. Right on time.