Look asshole, you are accusing me of supporting Putin, when in fact you cannot cite a single instance of it.
You’re just a liar. A simple liar at that.
Here are three:
20MAR2018:
“Putin has no credibility.”
Do US and British Intelligence have any remaining?
I have long asserted that one of the great tragedies of the Western World, and severe National Security issues of our time, is the fact our intelligence agencies have squandered all their credibility playing politics.
We’re now in a world of he said, he said.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3641095/posts?page=8#8
14FEB2018:
“If Putin wants to serve his Iranian masters by fighting there, that’s his business, but let’s not pretend he’s some kind of hero or fighting against the bad guys or protecting Christians.”
Putin is serving Russian interests, exclusively. He is protecting Russia’s access to a warm water Mediterranean port and air base south of the Bosporus.
He is also honoring a formal treaty to protect the government and territory of Syria. Something that is necessary to be seen as a reliable partner on the world stage. I appears the only reason for the US is there is to thwart Russia. And that’s piss-poor foreign policy.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3632066/posts?page=42#42
30JAN2018:
80+%.
Putin is broadly liked in his country, I know of no serous person who disputes that.
And he has a vehement, dedicated core of detractors. They come from two schools:
1. The thugs who want his empire for themselves. Navalny and his ilk.
2. Jeffersonian (d)emocrats who want to forge a republic not unlike the US. Too small in number to even warrant suppression.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/gop/3627447/posts?page=21#21
I’m not the one who has chastised others for pointing out what the real Russia is like or, what looks like trying to stifle conversation. Sorry for the misunderstanding. What is one to think about that?