[saywhatagain]

I have seen this before. I can't make out names from this pic.

I have some issues with this. Because I can't see clearly, be careful here, I may be wrong.

But this is one of the pilots personal flight logbook. I have no doubt of its accuracy, but this evidence would not hold up in any court. It appears, that the person would log in "notable" passengers on his airplane?? That column would be labeled "Remarks."

Without supporting evidence . . . anybody could make that up. Now it could be matched up with the "airplane logbook." I would expect to see same date and times. This same person would have had access to the flight manifest. Unless he took a copy of that, yeah this not worth much

I know I am getting to technical. The next question is what FAR Part Reg were they flying under. If Part 91 there will not be any passenger list. If part 135, that list is required to be kept for 90 days and then throw it away.

Ok, I will take my work hat off and take a break. 555

[No_Doll_i]

Gotcha. I’ll go over to 8chan at some point and see what they have. Or maybe to 24/7 live chat, if I can stand it.

Thanks, a lot of good people here tonight that got a bunch of info in short order.

THANK Q YOU ALL!!!

[edzo4]

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1507315-epstein-flight-manifests.html

Here’s the handwritten logs that were admitted as evidence