Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

So then Southerners DID secede to preserve slavery, since that was the source of their money. That’s the inescapable conclusion to be drawn from your own words.


304 posted on 04/20/2018 2:55:23 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]


To: SoCal Pubbie
So then Southerners DID secede to preserve slavery, since that was the source of their money.

You really really want to keep repeating that mantra in the hopes that it will eventually persuade someone.

The hole in your theory is the fact that they would still have slavery if they *didn't* secede. It's funny how you keep zooming right past that without acknowledging that the Union was going to keep legal slavery for at least 40 more years.

Their 4 billion in assets would not be lost from staying in the Union. Kinda blows your whole motive thing.

That’s the inescapable conclusion to be drawn from your own words.

Inescapable? Wasn't even confining. It was tissue paper.

307 posted on 04/20/2018 3:10:57 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson