So now it's about Nazis? A sure sign you're losing it.
For better or for worse, we have big businesses in America, but those aren't all concentrated in one city or one part of the country.
Nor were they really in 1860. One city was bigger than the others, but it wasn't government edicts that made it large or profitable.
Government action -- splitting up the country -- wouldn't suddenly achieve your goal of "social justice."
When influence becomes so large that it can set government policy, it has become a threat to the rest of the nation.
Slavery wasn't an interest so large that it could set government policy?
Land hunger wasn't an interest so large that it set government policy in Jackson's day?
It's not just "special interests" in faraway New York that can be dangerous.
P.S. Your ideas really aren't that interesting. People just respond to you because you're always posting some nonsense or other.
Have you ever studied the Nazi government structure? I was enlightened to it many years back by another Freeper who told me a lot more about it than I knew.
Wealthy and powerful people were allowed to retain control of their companies, but they were put into close intimate contact with German government officials to oversee and manage what they were doing. Smaller companies were forced to disband by law, and all the rest took direction from the state.
The point here is that there was massive collusion between the German Government and the Elite businessmen who ran their various corporations.
I mentioned the Nazis because it is the closest thing to the direction we have been going. The Freeper I mentioned (who's name I have forgotten) had a *LOT* of information about the Nazi industry/government power structure and the Nazi economic system. Everyone should familiarize themselves with this system, because as I said, this is what things are starting to look like here.
For better or for worse, we have big businesses in America, but those aren't all concentrated in one city or one part of the country.
Nor were they really in 1860. One city was bigger than the others, but it wasn't government edicts that made it large or profitable.
Did we come to a conclusion about whether or not "trade" was the life-blood of New York?
Government action -- splitting up the country -- wouldn't suddenly achieve your goal of "social justice."
Keeping the Country together would obviously do nothing for the cause of "social justice" either. I think this is pretty good evidence that no one was motivated by "social justice" in that conflict.
Slavery wasn't an interest so large that it could set government policy?
Obviously not. And even if it were in control of the Government, what would it have done? How would you advance the interests of slave holders if they controlled the government?
It's not just "special interests" in faraway New York that can be dangerous.
You haven't noticed how their puppet News Services are trying to take down Trump? You didn't notice how they tried to put that corrupt Nazi psycho hate witch in power?
I think those who control the news are a lot more dangerous than those who do not. There is a reason all the dictators first gain control of the propaganda apparatus. There is a reason they allow no other messages to compete with their own.